MEMBANGUN SUPERVISI PENDIDIKAN YANG EFEKTIF MELALUI BERBAGAI TIPE SUPERVISI

Muhammad Hidayat; Sabran Sabran; Sri Susmiyati

doi:10.56489/mrrb8n21

Penulis

Muhammad Hidayat Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
Sabran Sabran Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda
Sri Susmiyati Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56489/mrrb8n21

Kata Kunci:

Supervisi Pendidikan, Efektivitas Supervisi, Tipe Supervisi, Supervisi Akademik, Mutu Pendidikan

Abstrak

Supervisi pendidikan merupakan salah satu strategi penting dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pendidikan melalui pembinaan profesional guru. Supervisi tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai pengawasan administratif, tetapi juga sebagai proses pendampingan yang berorientasi pada peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana membangun supervisi pendidikan yang efektif melalui penerapan berbagai tipe supervisi, meliputi supervisi administratif, supervisi akademik, supervisi klinis, supervisi kolaboratif, serta supervisi individual dan kelompok. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah studi pustaka dengan menelaah literatur ilmiah dan hasil penelitian terbaru yang relevan dengan supervisi pendidikan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas supervisi sangat ditentukan oleh ketepatan pemilihan tipe supervisi sesuai dengan kebutuhan guru dan konteks sekolah. Supervisi yang dilaksanakan secara terencana, kolaboratif, dan berkelanjutan mampu meningkatkan kinerja guru, kualitas proses pembelajaran, serta berkontribusi pada peningkatan mutu pendidikan secara keseluruhan. Oleh karena itu, integrasi berbagai tipe supervisi menjadi kunci utama dalam membangun supervisi pendidikan yang efektif.

Referensi

Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D., Clinical Supervision and Teacher Development, New York: Wiley, 2016, hlm. 32–35; Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M., SuperVision and Instructional Leadership, Boston: Pearson, 2018, hlm. 9–11.

Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D., Clinical Supervision and Teacher Development, New York: Wiley, 2016, hlm. 31–34; Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. A., Teacher Supervision and Evaluation, Hoboken: Wiley, 2018, hlm. 55–57.

Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D., Clinical Supervision and Teacher Development, New York: Wiley, 2016, hlm. 34–38; Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J., Supervision That Improves Teaching, Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, 2018, hlm. 49–52.

Acheson, K. A., & Gall, M. D., Clinical Supervision and Teacher Development, New York: Wiley, 2016, hlm. 39–42; Zeichner, K., & Liston, D., Reflective Teaching, New York: Routledge, 2018, hlm. 63–66.

Creswell, J. W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2018, hlm. 41–44; Moleong, Lexy J., Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2021, hlm. 6–8.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M., SuperVision and Instructional Leadership, Boston: Pearson Education, 2018, hlm. 33–36; Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. A., Teacher Supervision and Evaluation, Hoboken: Wiley, 2018, hlm. 60–63.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M., SuperVision and Instructional Leadership, Boston: Pearson Education, 2018, hlm. 37–40; Blase, J., & Blase, J., “Effective Instructional Leadership,” Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 45 No. 2, 2019, hlm. 225–228.

Harris, A., & Jones, M., “Professional Learning Communities and School Improvement,” Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 21 No. 2, 2020, hlm. 124–128; Zepeda, S. J., Instructional Supervision, New York: Routledge, 2017, hlm. 59–62.

Harris, A., & Jones, M., “Professional Learning Communities and School Improvement,” Journal of Educational Change, Vol. 21 No. 2, 2020, hlm. 129–133; Zepeda, S. J., Instructional Supervision, New York: Routledge, 2017, hlm. 63–66.

Kemendikbud, Panduan Supervisi Akademik, Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal GTK, 2021, hlm. 14–16; Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M., SuperVision and Instructional Leadership, Boston: Pearson, 2018, hlm. 12–14.

Krippendorff, K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2019, hlm. 87–90; Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H., “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 62 No. 1, 2018, hlm. 109–112.

Mulyasa, Menjadi Guru Profesional, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019, hlm. 11–13; Darling-Hammond, L., “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement,” Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol. 8 No. 1, 2018, hlm. 1–2.

Purwanto, Ngalim, Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020, hlm. 74–76; Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J., Supervision: A Redefinition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 40–42.

Purwanto, Ngalim, Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020, hlm. 73–75; Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G., Educational Administration, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 312–314.

Purwanto, Ngalim, Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020, hlm. 76–79; Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G., Educational Administration, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 315–318.

Purwanto, Ngalim, Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2020, hlm. 80–83; Glanz, J., “Supervision: Don’t Discount the Value of Administrative Supervision,” Educational Leadership, Vol. 77 No. 3, 2020, hlm. 24–27.

Sahertian, Piet A., Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017, hlm. 18–20; Zepeda, S. J., Instructional Supervision, New York: Routledge, 2017, hlm. 6–7.

Sahertian, Piet A., Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017, hlm. 17–19; Bush, T., Theories of Educational Leadership and Management, London: Sage, 2018, hlm. 121–123.

Sahertian, Piet A., Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017, hlm. 21–24; Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J., Supervision: A Redefinition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 45–47.

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J., Supervision: A Redefinition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 39–41; Zepeda, S. J., Instructional Supervision, New York: Routledge, 2017, hlm. 8–10.

Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J., Supervision: A Redefinition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2019, hlm. 45–48; Sahertian, Piet A., Konsep Dasar dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2017, hlm. 25–28.

Wahjosumidjo, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2021, hlm. 98–101; Bush, T., & Glover, D., “School Leadership and Management,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 42 No. 5, 2020, hlm. 560–565.

Wahjosumidjo, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2021, hlm. 100–102; Bush, T., & Glover, D., “School Leadership and Management,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Vol. 42 No. 5, 2020, hlm. 560–565.

Wahjosumidjo, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2021, hlm. 106–109; Fullan, M., Leading in a Culture of Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2018, hlm. 92–95.

Wahjosumidjo, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2021, hlm. 110–113; Fullan, M., Leading in a Culture of Change, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2018, hlm. 96–99.

Zed, Mestika, Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan, Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2018, hlm. 23–27; Snyder, H., “Literature Review as a Research Method,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 104, 2019, hlm. 334–336.

Zepeda, S. J., Instructional Supervision, New York: Routledge, 2017, hlm. 56–58; Harris, A., “Teacher Leadership and School Improvement,” School Leadership & Management, Vol. 34 No. 5, 2019, hlm. 454–457.